A French Kiss to Netanyahu
Judas Iscariot kisses Judas Iscariot
New in the Website
Governments seldom make true statements; this is best seen in the contradictions they often create. In “Hold Me Back,” Shouts Netanyahu, I commented on the French President Sarkozy words of November 3, when he claimed that his country would not stand idly by “if Israel's existence were threatened.” Days later, during the G20 meeting in Cannes, Sarkozy was caught by a microphone while saying to President Obama that he can’t support Netanyahu and that Netanyahu is a liar. The mainstream media - like the CNN, from which its Spanish report I took the picture below - reported the microphone had been left open erroneously and that the broadcast had created a delicate situation between this three allies. “You are fed up with him, but I have to deal with him even more often than you,” Mr. Obama replied. The Israeli prime minister’s office refused to comment. The remarks were first reported by a French Web site, Arrêt Sur Images, on Monday. They were subsequently confirmed by The Associated Press, which had a representative among those who overheard the conversation. Reuters also confirmed the comments.
If one were an innocent kid, it would be possible to claim both statements do not contradict. Sarkozy can support Israel while despising Netanyahu. Such a benevolent attitude would ignore the fact neither Netanyahu nor Sarkozy work in a vacuum. Their declarations and statements are part of a governmental team work; they lead the respective teams, but they are not tyrants. Declarations regarding international issues are carefully weighed.
Claiming the broadcast was unknown to Sarkozy and thus there is no contradiction between the statements would be naïve. If Sarkozy’s words had been uttered by error, they would have been suppressed. Both America and France have proved in many occasions being able to manipulate the media. The Iraqi Weapons of Mass Destruction Affair and the subsequent criminal attack by the USA on Iraq is a good example of that. Most information provided by the American government on that event proved as being nothing but deliberate lies.
There is no choice but to conclude Sarkozy gave Netanyahu a Judas kiss. Judas Iscariot kissed Judas Iscariot.
Can Netanyahu blackmail the US, the UK and France to attack Iran? Netanyahu seems keen on destructing Iran, and would be delighted to Wag the Dog by forcing its allies to do the dirty work for him. Even if the Mossad would fake an Indonesian birth certificate for Obama and publish it on the New York Times, it is difficult to believe the US will fall pray to such a manipulation. Iran is not Iraq. It is much larger, has a huge population and its administrative centers are mainly within a mountainous area. Moreover, Iranians have developed reliable and advanced military technologies. The American defeat in Vietnam will look as a picnic compared to what may happen in Iran. Would America sacrifice two million sons for the sake of the Zionist state?
Does this explain the Sarkozy-Obama staged event? Are they trying to erode Netanyahu’s image so that the last would find much harder to force international media to support an attack on Iran? Discredit Netanyahu and the Iranian Weapons of Mass Destruction Affair would be over before it began. So, I apologize to the New York Times, the BBC and the CNN, but that’s much more credible than an inexperienced reporter leaving an open microphone at a major international event.
If that’s true, Israel is alone. Yet, Netanyahu and Barak keep talking about attacking Iran, while stating they are being currently held back by the Israeli security services. Yesterday, even Shimon Peres publicly claimed the military option against Iran is the most probable outcome of the current situation.
Let’s say Netanyahu orders an attack on Iran. How would it look? Israel would send planes to make surgical attacks on Iran. These would stop over in Georgia or Armenia, and after that may destroy a few sites in Iran. If Netanyahu gets wild, he may even launch land-to-land missiles.
Once the Israeli attack is detected, Iran would legitimately act in self defense. Considering the Iranian strength, Israel chances would be slim. Kanaf 2 (Wing 2, near Moshav Zaharia, Jerusalem) and Baha 30 (Air Force Base 30 in Palmahim) are the main launching sites of Israeli ballistic missiles and would be major targets. Considering there are around fifty thousand missiles of all types aimed at Israel, from Iran and its allies in Lebanon and Gaza, it is impossible to see how Israel would block this self-defense attack, regardless how advanced the Arrow anti-missiles system is. The same goes for the air bases from were the offensive planes depart, and for the country’s main highways, which double as runways during emergencies. Fifty thousand missiles are enough to destroy all these and then keep going at other major centers of the IDF and the Israeli Administration. The Israeli Administration may be destroyed in a matter of hours. The IDF Northern Command in Tzfat may be one of the few centers surviving the attack – it is almost 200 meters underground - yet, those trapped underneath the mountain won’t have any other place to go.
Netanyahu knows this. So, what is this little Judas planning? It’s not a suicide for sure…
Judges 16:30 And Samson said, Let me die with the Philistines. And he bowed himself with all his might; and the house fell upon the lords, and upon all the people that were therein. So the dead which he slew at his death were more than they which he slew in his life.
In Israel’s Second Strike I described the most probable answer to such a missiles attack on Israel. Without repeating the complete analysis brought there, I want to mention that Israel's submarines are meant to give Israel a "second strike" nuclear option, meaning that Israel would be able to strike with nuclear weapons from submarines at hidden sea locations even if its territory is destroyed. There are many sources claiming that, and this is more than credible if we remember Samson’s Option.
In 1991, Random House published The Samson Option: Israel's Nuclear Arsenal and American Foreign Policy by Seymour Hersh. The largest publisher in the world, Random House is closely related to Israel and Jews, as shown in The Da Vinci Nazi; it is difficult to believe this publication took place without the approval and support of Israel. The book's title refers to the nuclear strategy whereby Israel would launch a nuclear retaliatory strike if the state was being overrun, just as the Biblical figure Samson pushed apart the pillars of a Philistine temple, bringing down the roof and killing himself and thousands of Philistines who had gathered to see him humiliated.
Netanyahu is looking ahead to the day after tomorrow. He – with his Zionist Elders – is planning for the case Israel won’t survive. Iran is not a threat, after all the Islamic Republic of Iran had never attacked any other country. The real threats on Israel are internal, as frequently exposed in this website.
How would they continue to be leaders if the state changes for good? How would they stay in power if it becomes a true democracy also for its Palestinian citizens? The time of choices is approaching. The Jewish leadership will not renounce to its powers, it doesn’t matter the cost. In order to stay in power during the next (and final) Diaspora, they need a new narrative to sell to their badly beaten sheep. Here is where the Iranian scenario begins to make sense. This time the narrative would be Samson’s Option, a nuclear holocaust. It may begin as a false flag attack; in order for this to work, the Jewish leaders must be able to claim “we were attacked; the entire world is still against us!” Iran may be forced to give a defensive strike – the one described in Israeli Defense Ministry Acknowledges Defeat - on Israel, following surgical Israeli strikes on Iranian installations. The initiating excuse matters little; Israel must force a cataclysmic attack on itself. Damage so heavy the State of Israel wouldn’t be viable anymore. Then, the culprit would be then destroyed with the second strike capability acquired with the help of German submarines. This last step is necessary in order to destroy all proofs of the scheme, so that history would be written (again) by Zionist forces abroad, with the gracious help of Random House and allies.
Israel is not a country as per Western definitions. In Israel and the Jewish Fatherland Law and other articles I show the State of Israel is better understood by ethnic-religious definitions typical of Asian cultures. The Jewish leaders do not need a proper Western country in order to keep leading their sheep. They just need a narrative giving them legitimacy in the eyes of their slaves. And if there is no such narrative, they’ll make it.
My articles on the web are my main income these days; please recognize my efforts in writing them by donating or buying a copy of The Cross of Bethlehem, or Back in Bethlehem.